Abstract 

Purpose

We aimed to develop a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm for automated quantification of aortic valve calcium (AVC) from non-enhanced electrocardiogram-gated cardiac CT scans and compare performance of DL-measured AVC volume and Agatston score with those of visual gradings by radiologist readers for classification of AVC severity.

Method

A total of 589 CT examinations performed at a single center between March 2010 and August 2017 were retrospectively included. The DL algorithm was designed to segment AVC and to quantify AVC volume, and Agatston score was calculated using attenuation values. Manually measured AVC volume and Agatston score were used as ground truth. To validate AVC segmentation performance, the Dice coefficient was calculated. For observer performance testing, four radiologists determined AVC grade in two reading rounds. The diagnostic performance of DL-measured AVC volume and Agaston score for classifying severe AVC was compared with that of each reader’s assessment.

Results

After applying the DL algorithm, the Dice coefficient score was 0.807. In patients with AVC, accuracy of DL-measured AVC volume for AVC grading was 97.0 % with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.964 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.923–1) in the test set, which was better than the radiologist readers (accuracy 69.7 %–91.9 %, AUC 0.762–0.923) with manually measured AVC volume as ground truth. When manually measured AVC Agatston score was used as ground truth, accuracy of DL-measured AVC Agatston score for AVC grading was 92.9 % with AUC of 0.933 (95 % CI 0.885–0.981) in the test set, which was also better than the radiologist readers (accuracy 77.8–89.9 %, AUC 0.791–0.903).

Conclusions

DL-based automated AVC quantification may be comparable with manual measurements. The diagnostic performance of the DL-measured AVC volume and Agatston score for classification of severe AVC outperforms radiologist readers.

Journal: European Journal of Radiology

Author

Suyon Chang, Hwiyoung Kim, Young Joo Suh, Dong Min Choi, Hyunghu Kim, Dong Kyu Kim, Jin Young Kim, Jin Young Yoo, and Byoung Wook Choi

DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109582